Plan Colombia: Cashing in on the Drug War Failure | Ed Asner

Plan Colombia: Cashing in on the Drug War Failure | Ed Asner | Coke A Cola if I herd right....

DVDs:

Plan Colombia: Cas...

	Plan Colombia: Cashing in on the Drug War Failure Ed Asner Cinema Libre, 2005 average customer review:based on 7 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

A 20-year "war on drugs" in Colombia has been paid for by the U.S. taxpayers. Still more and more drugs and narco-dollars are entering the U.S. every year. Is it a mere failure by Washington? Or is it a smokescreen to secure Colombia's oil & natural resources?System Requirements: Running Time 57 MinFormat: DVD MOVIE Genre: DOCUMENTARIES/MISC. Rating: NR UPC: 881394500228 Manufacturer No: DOC50022

More Americans need to be made aware of what we are doing in Colombia.

Although most Americans probably know very little about Colombia, this country receives the most US "aid" after Israel and Egypt. Why? That's precisely the question this documentary attempts to answer.

Under president Clinton, Plan Colombia was created as part of the "War on Drugs." There are two main parts to this policy:

1) Spraying large fields of Coca (the plant from which cocaine is produced) with highly toxic pesticides.

2) Sending millions of dollars in aid (money, soldiers and weaponry) to the right-wing government and its military to assist in fighting the FARC, a left-wing guerrilla group involved in drug trafficking.

However, this program has had no effect in reducing cocaine production (in Colombia) or consumption (in the US) because:

1) Poor peasants who produce Coca continue to do so because it is the source of their livelihood (although at this level of production they are not exactly getting rich off of it). If they could grow bananas, for example, instead of Coca, and make money, they would. But, there is not the same market for bananas as for Coca.

2) It is incredibly difficult to eradicate the Coca plant because it is very resistant, like weeds. So, although the toxic pesticides we are using are causing environmental destruction and are possibly endangering the health of Colombians, we are unable to destroy all the Coca crops.

3) The only way to reduce drug trafficking is by eliminating the demand (remember the good old law of supply and demand?). Reducing the supply through these methods only makes the demand increase, which pushes up the price and makes people willing to take even greater risks to produce and sell cocaine. Although study after study has shown that domestic drug treatment programs are more effective in combating drug abuse, in the US we continue to spend very little on these programs while spending "billions" on trying to reduce the supply.

4) The Colombian government, its military and paramilitary (the paramilitary "claim" to have no connection to the government, but everyone knows otherwise) are also involved in drug trafficking. Thus, we are essentially sending money directly to drug traffickers.

Faced with these failures, why do we continue with this program? Why did the US, under Bush, actually increase funding to Plan Colombia? The documentary gives the following answers.

1) After the Middle East, most of the oil that comes into the US comes from this region (Venezuela and Colombia). The US wants to ensure that a strong right-wing regime that is friendly to US corporate interests remains in power indefinitely. That way we have secure access to their oil. This situation has become particularly pressing now that Venezuela, the biggest oil producer in Latin America, has a "socialist" and "anti-American" president (Hugo Chávez) in power who has made it clear that he does not want to take orders from the US; although he continues to sell us a large supply of oil. In short, we are in Colombia to secure the right-wing regime and crush the leftist guerillas (the FARC).

2) Plan Colombia is a form of corporate welfare for companies belonging to the "military industrial complex." Big corporations, that are also big campaign contributors, are making a lot of money by selling their pesticides, helicopters, guns, and even their soldiers (like in Iraq we are sending "private contractors" to fight the FARC) to the US government, which in turn sends the soldiers and equipment to Colombia.

In addition to the program's huge cost to the American taxpayer, its failure to reduce drug trafficking and consumption, and its aiding drug traffickers, the documentary argues that this program has essentially implicated the US in terrible human rights violations. The paramilitaries have committed all sorts of abuses, not only against the FARC but also against the civilian population in Colombia. Through illegal kidnapping, torture and murder the paramilitaries have been able to intimidate the rural population. They want to create an environment in which people are afraid of challenging the right-wing government. Not only have international human rights groups deplored the actions of the (US supported) Colombian paramilitaries, but it is causing a internal refugee crisis, as poor peasants are flocking to the cities out fear of the paramilitary.

Although the documentary makes it clear that the FARC has had its hand in drug trafficking and human rights abuses, since we are not funding the FARC, this is not "our" responsibility. The question this documentary poses is: Should we continue spending billions of US tax dollars to fund the paramilitary (which commits terrible human rights abuses) to secure the Colombian oil supply and provide corporate welfare to the defense industries, and should we continue destroying the environment to make sure there is a market for Monsantos's toxic pesticides?

I highly recommend this documentary to anyone interested in a better understanding what's going on in Colombia. The producers are independent filmmakers (Gerard Ungerman & Audrey Brohy) who produce well-researched and engaging documentaries. I also recommend their "Hidden Wars of Desert Storm" (about the Gulf War) and "Peru: Between the Hammer & the Anvil" (about the war between the Peruvian government and Sendero Luminoso). Their most recent documentary, which I have not yet seen is "The Oil Factor: Behind the War on Terror."

for more information click here

Coke A Cola if I herd right....

imports like Millions of Pounds of Coca leaves to be proccessed for there Soda,so I doubt they will ever kill all of the plants plus IMO it's yet another Huge Waste of USA funding and that's just the way I see it.

Another Failure In the War On Drugs

This documentary interviews various politicians, policy wonks and even a few regular folks to explain why Plan Colombia has been a failure. In fact, it has not only failed to eradicate the coca plant but has actually made life worse for many innocent Colombians, including those made ill by the irresponsible dropping of dangerous pesticides on farm land. The doc also correctly points out that the profit margain is so great that it only takes common sense to realize that poor campesinos are going to continue to grow coca leafs as long as there is a ready market for cocaine in the United States and other countries.

The film makers do go a little too easy on the FARC guerillas, who are involved big time in narco-trafficking and have left this beautiful nation, which I have visited twice, in an ongoing civil war with no end in sight. But still the film's major points about the failures of Plan Colombia are on the mark and will help to educate the public on this issue.

for more information click here

reviews: page 1, 2

products you might be interested in