book: Degrees of sleaze: the trouble with balanced reporting. (Campaign '92) (Cover Story): An...

book: Degrees of sleaze: the trouble with balanced reporting. (Campaign '92) (Cover Story): An article from: ... | Victor S. Navasky

books:

Degrees of sleaze:...

	Degrees of sleaze: the trouble with balanced reporting. (Campaign '92) (Cover Story): An article from: ... Victor S. Navasky Columbia University, Graduate School of Journalism, 1993
	for more information click here

This digital document is an article from Columbia Journalism Review, published by Columbia University, Graduate School of Journalism on January 1, 1993. The length of the article is 1562 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: The media's coverage of the senatorial campaign between New York Senator Alfonse D'Amato and state Attorney General Robert Abrams was unbiased to a fault. Both candidates accused each other of misconduct while in office. However, the evidence against D'Amato was real and voluminous, while the accusations against Abrams were primarily insinuation on the part of D'Amato. Press reporters dutifully maintained neutrality but may have deprived the public of vital contextual information that could have influenced the outcome of the closely contested election. More critical reporting is needed.

Citation Details
Title: Degrees of sleaze: the trouble with balanced reporting. (Campaign '92) (Cover Story)
Author: Victor S. Navasky
Publication: Columbia Journalism Review (Refereed)
Date: January 1, 1993
Publisher: Columbia University, Graduate School of Journalism
Volume: v31 Issue: n5 Page: p45(2)

Article Type: Cover Story

Distributed by Thomson Gale

for more information click here

journalism