counter
about us
 
Our Man in Mexico: Winston Scott and the Hidden History of the CIA | Jefferson Morley | A hard look at hard C.I.A data
 
 


Suche books:   



 Our Man in Mexico:...  

Our Man in Mexico: Winston Scott and the Hidden History of the CIA
Jefferson Morley

University Press of Kansas, 2008 - 371 pages

average customer review:based on 5 reviews
view larger image
 for more information click here

     highly recommended  highly recommended



Mexico City was the Casablanca of the Cold War--a hotbed of spies, revolutionaries, and assassins. The CIA's station there was the front line of the United States' fight against international communism, as important for Latin America as Berlin was for Europe. And its undisputed spymaster was Winston Mackinley Scott.

Chief of the Mexico City station from 1956 to 1969, Win Scott occupied a key position in the founding generation of the Central Intelligence Agency, but until now he has remained a shadowy figure. Investigative reporter Jefferson Morley traces Scott's remarkable career from his humble origins in rural Alabama to wartime G-man to OSS London operative (and close friend of the notorious Kim Philby), to right-hand man of CIA Director Allen Dulles, to his remarkable reign for more than a decade as virtual proconsul in Mexico. Morley also follows the quest of Win Scott's son Michael to confront the reality of his father's life as a spy. He reveals how Scott ran hundreds of covert espionage operations from his headquarters in the U.S. Embassy while keeping three Mexican presidents on the agency's payroll, participating in the Bay of Pigs fiasco, and, most intriguingly, overseeing the surveillance of Lee Harvey Oswald during his visit to the Mexican capital just weeks before the assassination of President Kennedy.

Morley reveals the previously unknown scope of the agency's interest in Oswald in late 1963, identifying for the first time the code names of Scott's surveillance programs that monitored Oswald's movements. He shows that CIA headquarters cut Scott out of the loop of the agency's latest reporting on Oswald before Kennedy was killed. He documents why Scott came to reject a key finding of the Warren Report on the assassination and how his disillusionment with the agency came to worry his longtime friend James Jesus Angleton, legendary chief of CIA counterintelligence. Angleton not only covered up the agency's interest in Oswald but also, after Scott died, absconded with the only copies of his unpublished memoir.

Interweaving Win Scott's personal and professional lives, Morley has crafted a real-life thriller of Cold War intrigue--a compelling saga of espionage that uncovers another chapter in the CIA's history.


 for more information click here


Fixed Position of Camera Enables the Clear Causal Outline of a Flowchart!

A critical question makes the Kennedy Assassination perhaps more relevant to today than ever:to what extent is the nominal leader, the President, really in control of the permanent military, political, and communications bureacracies that shape his options? In 1961, when Kennedy became president, key components of this permannent bureacracy were thirteen years old. As a parent with a teenager there were moments of tension when one can wonder who or what called the shots. This was uniquely the case in 1960, as for eight years-- the truly formative ones in the developement of the entire post-war US society-- the CIA had been given extreme lattitude. Kennedy's relations with the permanet political and military bureacracy can serve as basis of comparison for how matters of war and peace are decided today, when blame-game controversies sometimes seem mere PR strategies for plausible denial 10.0

Jefferson Morleys book leaves little doubt that no matter what our betters tell us, the CIA was to a very significant degree doing its own things in 1963. The reason this emerges far more clearly than in other books, is that Morley's never allows the ocean of detail to alter his camera agle. It is not a totalizing focus like some other books that mistake thickness for ambition. Rather, it sticks to the Mexico City CIA station, its chief Winston Scott, and his close World War Two friend and possibly his own privatest Idohaon-- the only one weirder than fellow poet and contemporary Ezra Pound-- James Jesus Angleton.

Morley is carefull. When your asking about unauthorized actions of the CIA people who normally talk freely in the New Yorker have a way of clamming up. It is hard to find sources in the middle ground, for example on the question of who knew what when about the Bay of Pigs. Far easier to treat this grey area as the blacktop of the Langley 500, the way Tim Weiner does in his childishly simplified and baldly propagandistic narration of Kennedy relations with the CIA.

How does he get insiders to talk for a book that is lethal to the government sanctioned version of the assassination? By not oversating things. By mentioning enough right wing cubans without so many as to lose sense of thier handlers. By clearly delineating who was in charge of what CIA operation, and who didn't know about them as well. We can see the critical wires cross, and are not confused in a whirl of unessential relations. We can see the extra piece-- George Joannides-- being added like one too many bones in an ankle and the clarity with which one could mistake treason for the logical coorination of a counterintelligence
operation. Individuals are not blamed here, but the flow chart that teaches how the Cubans were "turned" is clear for the first time. At least for me, but I'm gradual.

Also Morley tells the story from the persepctive of Win Scotts family. This "works" in many ways. It might just be the footwear necessary for treading accross one the most contested and and important middle grounds -- between president and permanent bureacracy-- in twentieth and 21st Century history.

This work stands in welcome contrast to recent books that mistake the shere number of mafia people who were involved with anti-castro opperations between 1959-63 with actual causal importance in the assassination of JFK. So often books like Ultimate Sacrifice emphasize the Mafia unconvincingly, because their CIA contacts merely seem outnumbered on the page. Morley goes to the quixotic center of the maypole: one has little doubt of this as he reads about Angletons very different, and very compartmetalized relations with Winston Scott and his secret sharer within the US embassy in Mexico City, David Atlee Phillips.


 for more information click here


A hard look at hard C.I.A data

This very well-documented book tells you in precise and unnerving detail how C.I.A.operatives work and what they knew about Oswald in Mexico before the Kennedy assassination -- a lot more than you knew befoe. It is particularly convincing because it's personal, the real story of a man who lived his life inside that system of power, accountable to no one. It's a page-turner with unrecognized spies (everyone?), double agents, stolen loves, a son wants to know his father, a loyal secretary, a dangerous wedding, enough destroyed documents to make you weep and an ending that sets up for a sequel we hope can come from further investigation by this diligent author. Highly recommended for everyone, not just specialists, but there is plenty here for them as well.



 for more information click here


...one step closer to the truth...



...peeling off layer after layer, we (well, those who still care, but I understand there are quite numerous around the world...) can now forty five years after the facts have a much better, much clearer understanding of what took place in Dallas.

The review above says it all. The book is on one level, the personnal history of the search of a son (adopted, it turns out..) for his mysterious, elusive father.

The fact that the father in question happenned to be Win Scot, head of the CIA Mexico station in the Sixties (the biggest CIA operation targeted at Soviet and Cuban interest outside the US) when Oswald, according to the official story, popped up there and started making himself noticed just a few weeks before Dallas, transforms what would be a mere personnal quest into something of historical importance.

Author Morley is known, appropriately, for his groundbreaking work bringing to light most notably the very strange story of George Joannides' s dealing with the DRE. Morley's work definitely showed how the CIA, deceptively, put Joannides in charge of contacts with the HSCA regarding Cuban matters, without ever mentioning his previous responsabilities as Focal Officer for the DRE during the latter part of November 63...

Students of JFK's assassination may remember that the DRE was very heavily involved in the early attempts to paint Oswald as a Communist Pro-Castro assassin, participating in a conspiracy.

Joannides's field reports on the DRE activities for the relevant period are still missing, and are the subject of a FOIA lawsuit by Morley....

A few pieces are still missing, and we still have a few open questions, but the picture is now getting clearer and clearer:

*the official story of the assassination is a fairy tale

*the events in Mexico City (most notably how the station and HQ handled the visits of a known "intelligence risk" to ennemy embassies..)are crucial in understanding what took place

*the inner workings of the CIA (need-to-know, etc..), and most notably the total autonomy and secrecy of Angleton's group (CI)made feasible any type of obscure intelligence operation whithout the slightest possibility of outside control or supervision.


Great, great book.

I would recommand as a companion Peter Dale Scott "Oswald in Mexico", which is the ultimate post-mortem on Mexico.

If you never thought reading administrative cables could make for a riveting read, or draw the outline of the most-wanted "smoking gun", brace yourself...


 for more information click here


A Realistic Picture

As a former longtime employee of CIA, I can attest that this book conveys a true picture of the goings on within the agency. The story focuses on the life of Win Scott, who rose to become station chief in Mexico City for many years. Meticulously researched and documented, the book relates how the "company" evolved from wartime OSS in London. We learn about some key operations in postwar Europe and in Central America, and about how counter-intelligence works.
Building his story by telling exactly who did what and when, this author has achieved an authentic history of the period through the assassination of President Kennedy and afterward. The CIA's contacts with Oswald in the weeks before the shooting in Dallas,
and the subsequent stonewalling, withholding and even destruction of information are all spelled out so the reader is aware of what pieces of history are still hidden.


 for more information click here


The Coda to a half Century of CIA History

Although the early chapters of this book give a detailed if an overly glamorized version of early CIA clandestine successes and even a glancing view of a few of its many failures, when it does finally get down to where the rubber meets the road; i.e., to the role Winston Scott, David Atlee Phillips, Richard Helms, E. Howard Hunt, and James Jesus Angleton, among others, played in the Mexico City events that presaged JFK's assassination, no one should be the least bit surprised that, as has happened elsewhere, this author ducked rather than face this pivotal issue straight-on. His clumsy and disingenuous attempt to finesse it finally robs the book of what little integrity it had a chance of claiming.

Offered up as Michael's (one of Winston Scott's sons), recollections, from his father's confiscated manuscript, the book sets forth the improbable and already thoroughly discredited theory that Oswald was a Communist agent "sent" by Castro to kill JFK. However, as even the evidence from Mexico City presented in this book attests, that "dog won't hunt." There is just too much contrary evidence that the CIA along with rightwing elements from the "Cowboy political sphere" were knee deep in the JFK assassination. (It is also what the Kennedys themselves believed.)

It is a much too fine-grained view of U.S.-Cuban episode from the Mexico City end of the telescope and thus is altogether an exceedingly weak apologia for the CIA's half-century of historical swashbuckling capers, including its involvement in the JFK assassination.

For most of its history, the guys here were a "band of brothers out to conquer the world and most of all protect it from Communism. But they were arrogant, smart, and untutored powers unto themselves, who played by their own rules and were unaccountable for their failures.

One will be hard-pressed to find even a single piece of independently confirmable evidence that Oswald was ever in Mexico City during the period the CIA claims he was there (between September 27-October 1, 1963). Compare that with the wealth of evidence produced by reading between the lines: that whoever was there was indeed impersonating Oswald, and was very likely under the full control of CIA handlers, most likely David Atlee Phillips and/or James Jesus Angleton -- and this version of events turns out to be much less than the sum of its parts. Even the author's summary passage on page 279 confirms this contrary point of view:

"The story of Oswald's encounters with Phillips' AMSPELL network; the missing LIERODE photos of his visit to the Cuban consulate; the misleading October 10 cable from HQT; the illegal HTLINGUAL monitoring of Oswald's correspondence, not to mention Karamessines' panicky efforts the day after JFK was killed to "preserve U.S. freedom of action on the whole question of Cuban responsibility" and Phillips promotion of Alvarado's provocative story, all tended to confirm what Fidel alleged, what Win Knew, and what supporters of the Warren Commission would heatedly deny: that "a person of great interest" to the CIA had killed the commander in Chief."

There is simply no one left in the known universe to believe the weakly concocted, transparent and well-worn "cover story" that Oswald's movements in the "fake" FPCC during his time in New Orleans and his "supposed" Mexico City visit went unmonitored, un-photographed and un-reported by the eagle-eyed "Sir" Winston Scott, or the equally intrepid CI master spy James Angleton. The incredulity required to believe that these two could have allowed Oswald to move freely from New Orleans to Mexico City, and then on to Dallas to murder a President they all hated, is so staggering as to leave a logical hole large enough to drive a Mac truck through.

To wit: Even though Scott and Angleton were nothing if not meticulous and exacting in their surveillance and data collection activities, the author wants us to believe the cockamamie story that there are no pictures of Oswald's "supposed" several visits to both the Cuban and Russian Embassies while in Mexico City on September 27, 1963. The one surviving photo (exposed by J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI) shows a portly man (depicted in the plates following page 246) whose voice was not that of Oswald entering and leaving those Embassies. The FBI data leaves open the distinct possibility that Oswald was never in Mexico City, or if there, never visited either Embassy.

Whatever is the truth, it is clear that Win Scott was among only a handful of insiders who knew what it was, but he went to his grave without telling us. In many ways this book is "The Ultimate Sacrifice" redux with a few new bells and whistles, a new twist in the plot here and there, but with the same ending: The JFK assassination was just an unfortunate case of the Kennedy brothers getting their own tails caught up in their own duplicity, while the CIA stood by watching them do so?

An equally plausible theory is that advanced by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison: that Oswald was a patsy set up by or controlled by David Atlee Phillips who was seen with Oswald in Dallas in the weeks between his supposed returned from Mexico, City and JFK's assassination. The man who testified to the House Committee on Assassinations of this version of events, Antonio Veciana, was shot in the head but survived. He of course changed his story afterwards. Can there be an innocent explanation for Phillips and Oswald being in each others company in Dallas a few weeks before JFK's assassination?

Regarding who actually killed JFK, James Angleton's enigmatic words about says it all:

"A mansion has many rooms and there are many things going on... I am not privy to who struck John." (page 290).

Three Stars


 for more information click here



products you might be interested in




recommendations

John F. Kennedy Assassination Reading
Blackford Oakes, Buckley, and CIA




history


Three Cups of Tea: One Man's Mission to Promote Peace . . . One ...
The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism
Loving Frank: A Novel
The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How The War on Terror Turned into ...
The Post-American World



hidden


The Book of Secrets: Unlocking the Hidden Dimensions of Your Life ...
Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions
America's Hidden History: Untold Tales of the First Pilgrims, ...
Stop the 401(k) Rip-off!: Eliminate Costly Hidden Fees to Improve ...
Rich Dad's Advisors®: The ABC's of Real Estate Investing: The Secrets ...



scott


What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture ...
The New Rules of Marketing and PR: How to Use News Releases, Blogs, ...
The Photoshop Elements 6 Book for Digital Photographers (Voices That ...
Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity
The Digital Photography Book, Volume 2



search for books
our man in, hidden, history, mexico, scott, winston



Google      toavi.com    web
books
apparel
baby
beauty
books
camera photo
classical music
computers
dvd
electronics
gourmet food
health personal care
kitchen
office products
outdoor living
computer video games
popular music
software
sporting goods
tools hardware
toys-games
vhs
watches jewelry







randomly chosen


book: Financial Management: Theory & Practice (with Thomson ONE - Business ...