The IRA, 1968-2000: An Analysis of a Secret Army (Cass Series on Political Violence, 7)

The IRA, 1968-2000: An Analysis of a Secret Army (Cass Series on Political Violence, 7) | J. Bowyer Bell | Extremely poor analysis

books:

The IRA, 1968-2000...

	The IRA, 1968-2000: An Analysis of a Secret Army (Cass Series on Political Violence, 7) J. Bowyer Bell Routledge, 2000 - 376 pages average customer review:based on 2 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

This study is based on thousands of interviews over 35 years with the leaders and members of the Republican movement and the IRA itself, as well as the Irish, British and Americans involved in the Troubles. Not unmindful of the unfolding of history, nor the relevance of events, the focus of this study is on the workings of an organization involved in armed struggle.
The book addresses the functioning of a revolutionary movement, not the theory, or the assumptions of observers. How does the IRA work, and why? Who gets what and at what cost? What are the advantages of secrecy and history - and what are the attractions of the secret army, and to whom?

for more information click here

Compulsory reading to understand contemporary Irish history

.................................... J. Bowyer Bell's latest effort on the issue of Northern Irish politics is a very welcome attempt to write a book about the IRA which might become a milestone in the analysis of political violence, in Ireland as well as elsewhere. Bowyer Bell's work is extremely well documented and has the features of real political sciences, in that he uses a series of events (30 years of Troubles!) as a starting point to reach more general conclusions. This is obviously possible thanks to his 35 years long attention to Irish politics and, most important, to his personal contacts with major and minor participants to those events. But he also tries to detach his analysis from the contingent, the current, the short-term, in order to provide the reader with keys to understand the Republican movement in Northern Ireland. The author succeeds where many others failed, keeping historical and political analysis apart from personal opinions and moral judgements, which is the hardest task when approaching the emotion-packed issue of Irish nationalism and "terrorism". His use of comparative analysis is also of great importance, stressing the general trends of political violence around the world, along with the peculiar features of the Irish case. All considered, Bowyer Bell's conclusions might be debatable (and thus they are scientific, according to Karl Popper!) but he often hits the mark. And always gives the reader food for thought!

for more information click here

Extremely poor analysis

At least Bell's earlier books included some basic facts and events in the narrative. This book wanders from over generalizations to unsupported assertions and back to over-generalizations. It's is embarrassing to call this incoherent rambling an "analysis"

recommendations

Terror! Even more terror than you wanted for breakfast.
An dtiochfaidh ar la?
WMD and Terrorism

political