Richard III | Ian McKellen, Annette Bening

Richard III | Ian McKellen, Annette Bening | A Chilling Version Of A Shakespeare Classic

DVDs:

Richard III

	Richard III Ian McKellen, Annette Bening MGM (Video & DVD), 2000 average customer review:based on 115 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

highly recommended

Shakespeare's immortal tale of ambition, lust and murderous treachery is brilliantly updated and brought to life in this riveting, 20th-century masterpiece. Boasting breathtaking performances, unforgettable imagery and two OscarÂ(r) nominations*, this astounding wartime spectacle is mesmerizing...it will rivet you and shock you (Jeffrey Lyons, 'sneak Previews ). In 1930s Britain, a savage, civil war between two royal families has just concluded. But even as the newly installed King Edward (John Wood) takes the reins of power, his ruthless, younger brother Richard (Ian McKellen) sets in motion a monstrous scheme to claim the crown for himself. Enlisting the aid of equally duplicitous allies in the court, Richard embarks on a merciless, single-minded campaign of betrayal, seduction and cold-blooded murder to achieve the goal that has obsessed him all of his tortured life: to beking...at any price. *1995: Costume Design, Art Direction

for more information click here

DELICIOUS AND POISONOUS

Generally I don't care much for modern adaptations of Shakespeare's plays, but in this case the work has been done so extremely well, and with such pathological flair, I'm absolutely convinced.

Wonderful idea to set RICHARD III in the 30s, and to parallel his rise to power with the rise of Fascism in Europe. Somehow, they managed to rise above the obvious, mostly by being so cold-bloodedly realistic about the time, the social class, and Richard's personal nastiness. The language remains intact, though there are judicious cuts, but the production has the rare distinction of looking like a film, as opposed to a filmed stage play; that's hard to do, but it succeeds very well here. The result is outrageous.

McKellen is wonderful in every sense of the word, playing everybody's favorite villian; the man you love to hate. But, but, playing deftly, intelligently, and with taste and a light, sardonic touch. To my mind, this is one of the few successful film versions of any Shakespeare play, on a level with Orson Welles' OTHELLO for inventiveness and verve; or Olivier's HAMLET, or the Zeferelli SHREW. Definitely one for your collection.

for more information click here

A Chilling Version Of A Shakespeare Classic

When it comes to updates of the Shakespeare plays , Richard III is probably the best of the lot. While it might seem like an unusual concept to take the classic play of deceit, betrayal, seduction, and cold-blooded murder out of the 1400's and into an alternate history 1930's version of England, the cast and production designs make that concept seem not only believable but so realistic you might find yourself wondering if this could really have happened if events had played out like they do in the film.

Ian McKellen plays the title role, the youngest brother of the royal family of the York's, who is determined to take the throne at whatever cost. McKellen's performance is chilling to say the least. From the moment he is introduced in a classic introduction to the battle sequence at the end of the film, McKellen makes the character of Richard seem to be the most evil villain ever to grace a movie screen as he is able to literally become the character in the vast web of deception via acting like he has no interest in taking the throne. McKellen sells Richard and he grips your attention to where your focus is entirely on him, making the trailer line about Richard being the "greatest villain of all time" ring very true and it's a shame that McKellen didn't even get an Oscar nomination for his performance.

Annette Benning plays Queen Elizabeth, the American wife of Richard's brother Edward. Many have complained about Benning in the role for various reasons including the fact that she is American and some question her acting ability. Benning, in my opinion, succeeds in making the idea of an American queen seem realistic and her acting talent matches up against McKellen in every scene the two are in together. Also keep in mind this is an alternate history, so an American queen of England isn't that unfeasible. Robert Downey Jr. plays her brother, Rivers. Rivers disappears about midway trough the film, but for the first half of the film, he is Richard's biggest enemy and his obvious dislike of Richard is evident in Downey's performance and the scene where his character meets his demise is shocking to say the least. Jim Broadbent plays the role of Buckingham, Richard's biggest supporter, with unnerving calm and his conniving attitude makes him almost as big of a villain as Richard. Kristin Scott Thomas is superb as Anne, the widow of one of Richard's victims who eventually falls for Richard and lives long enough to regret it. Her confrontation against Richard in a morgue towards the film's beginning stands out as one of the film's best scenes.

The concept of being updated to the 1930's is no more evident then in the production design. There is no doubt that we are in the 1930's and the filmmakers appear to have gone to great steps to make it evident that this is very much an alternate history. As I am sure others have commented this England is not the England we all know and love. Instead, one constantly gets the feeling that we are instead in a Nazi version of England. Everywhere in the film, in the costumes especially, the aura of Nazi Germany can be felt. Virtually all of Richard's costumes are based off German uniforms of the Nazi era, as are the uniforms worn by his supporters in the film's final half. If anyone doubts the influence of Nazi Germany on this alternate history version of England, look at the rally scene shortly before Richard is crowned. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to realize that this scene is a case of déjà vu: it is almost identical to the well known documentary footage we have all seen of Nazi rallies right down to the flags that, while containing a boar instead of the swastika, still makes one think that they're in Nazi Germany.

Also, Trevor Jones score is a must hear. The beautiful song at the beginning of the film sells the idea of the 1930's very well. The score, while at times going out of the 1930's, does the job of keeping the feeling of tension throughout the film and is another example of the talent of Trevor Jones.

The DVD release is a bit of a disappointment though. It's pretty standard fare from MGM with only a theatrical trailer for special features. It's shame considering how good of a film this is that there is no audio commentary or making of documentary.

Few films have the power to hold the attention of a viewer from beginning to end, especially when there is a large amount of dialog. But with the performance given by Ian McKellen, production design, battle sequences, and the score by Trevor Jones, Richard III easily counts not only as a must see but as a modern classic.

for more information click here

Doubt I can add anything useful

An excellent adaptation and a good film on its own. Ian McKellen gives a brilliant performance.

A Note About Where the Ending Was Borrowed From

The ending is taken from "White Heat" starring James Cagney playing gangster Cody Jarrett. As he falls, back-first, from atop the chemical storage tank, the camera tracks Jarrett's plunge into the hellish flames below. Jarrett's last words are: "Top of the world!"

As Richard falls to his death in the flames below, the soundtrack plays a song begins with the words: "I'm sitting on the top of the world, just rolling along, just rolling along...."

It couldn't just be mere coincidence.

for more information click here

McKellen, Broadbent, and a broad bore

McKellen shines; when does he not? Broadbent's performance could be easily overshadowed with a viewer that lacks familiarity with his work, but take my word, pay attention to the little things - his mannerisms - that a master actor can do.
Now, I realize that I used the word "broad" in my title, and while I originally intended it as word-play and to communicate my overall boredom at watching this film, I would be remiss if I didn't comment on what my subconscious wanted to say. Annette Bening is not a great actress. She's not as horrible as Irene Jacob in 'Othello' but she does very little that's good. Kristin Scott Thomas, however, deserves accolades for her understated performance.
Additionally, the inclusion of Robert Downey Jr. on the cover is misleading - he plays Rivers, and might be in the film for a total of 5 minutes; as a fan of his work, I was looking forward to seeing him act with the big boys, but that was not to be.

for more information click here