The Art of Electronics | Paul Horowitz, Winfield Hill

The Art of Electronics | Paul Horowitz, Winfield Hill | Book of many uses

books:

The Art of Electro...

	The Art of Electronics Paul Horowitz, Winfield Hill Cambridge University Press, 1989 - 1125 pages average customer review:based on 124 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

highly recommended

electronics hobbyist

This is a great book for anyone who loves electronics.The book has a ton of information on how to design circuits, characteristic of components,how circuit's act,how to build them,don't be surprise when you can take advantage of the wealth of information to build your own radio.I would recommend this book to any one who has a background in electronics,but not to anyone who don't have any knowledge of electronic's.This book by far has to much information for the average person to handle.I suggest to anyone who want's to get started in electronics,go to class first.Get acquainted with electronic test equipment,do ton's of problems associated with ohm's law,know how to experiment.Then buy this book.But to the new person,don't buy this book to get started in electronic,do class first,then buy the book.

for more information click here

Book of many uses

I have used this book in the book stores while pursuing my BSEE. Now I am finishing my Junior year and finally decided to purchase the set. So far this semester, I have used this book as a reference for Digitals, Linear circuits, RF, signals and systems and much more. It is truly amazing how much this book covers. I am a TA in an electronics lab and am using this as the reference for test equipment procedures since my school doesn't have one. As a retired signal and radar technician from the Army I am happy to have found a resource that says it all.

Art of Electronics - the bible

This is THE BIBLE for electronics

If you only buy one textbook, this is the one.

It has taken me years to buy it (I kept borrowing other peoples) but finaly got my own copy.

Note to no US readers: many of the circuits assume 60Hz mains and use it for timing etc. but all the math is there to support.

for more information click here

Well worth your effort

If this is not the best (and only) entertaining book on electronics, it is at least a requirement to read of every student who wishes to learn electronics the fun way; the way it should be taught! I'm returning to it after having put it off a long time; so I'm starting from the first chapter and doing almost every excercise as I go. I find that the student manual is just as invaluable as the book. Everything seems to make perfect sense everywhere.
Has anyone worked out Excercise 1.6. My answer is 24.2 feet for power loss of 10^10 W, and aout 40000 degrees Kelvin for part C!. The solution to the puzzle is obviously to use high voltage to transmit the power so as to minimize the current. Any "feedback" ? Thank you

for more information click here

Good book for first exposure to many topics...

This book has numerous glowing reviews, so I will not repeat much about the book's strengths - its broad coverage, readable style, and extensive data tables. However, this is really an "electronics for scientists" type of book. I have a Ph.D in EE. I feel that more EE's should have and own such books, since they have a lot of detail that are not presented in EE texts. However, despite its encyclopedic size, this text is most suitable as a "first look" at an area in electronics and is not detailed enough in almost any area it covers if you are trying to do something new in that area. The authors make claims such as "Much of the favorite pedagogy of beginning textbooks is quite unnecessary and, in fact, is not used by practicing engineers...electronics...is basically a simple art, a combination of some basic laws, rules of thumb, and a large bag of tricks...the treatment is largely nonmathematical..." Perhaps if one is designing circuits for simpler science experiments or for some noncritical application in industry using discrete components, there is an element of truth to this. However, I do not know many EE's who can avoid a lot of mathematical analysis, particularly in designing ICs or high precision circuits, whether they do it by hand, MathCAD, or PSPICE. Although the data tables are a strength, they quickly become outdated. Perhaps it is good that equations are not emphasized because there are numerous typos - e.g. see Ex1.6c "...if you know the physics involved sigma = 6E12 W/K^4*cm^2..." - they lost the minus sign (6E-12) off the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and poor students who do not know the physics will be off by 24 orders of magnitude. The book is already too big and has many topics that are presented in too little detail - one example - this entire description of a magnetron - "The heart of radar and microwave ovens: a high power oscillator tube, full of little resonant cavities, and operated in a large magnetic field to make the electrons spiral around inside." Accurate? Yes - but what use is this abbreviated description to anyone? The authors state "We have avoided (load lines) because, well, it just isn't useful..." Again, this is true for some circuit design, but not in general, especially if working with new kinds or non-standard semiconductor devices. It is like saying that quantum mechanics is not useful to most physicists. Perhaps very few physicists do quantum mechanical calculations every day, but since it is the basis for much in the field, shouldn't one learn it, or at least not downgrade its importance?

for more information click here