Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War | Robert Coram

Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War | Robert Coram | OUTSTANDING

books:

Boyd: The Fighter ...

	Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War Robert Coram Back Bay Books, 2004 - 504 pages average customer review:based on 92 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

highly recommended

Forty Second Boyd

Robert Coram's "Boyd - The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War," is a great read about Colonel John Boyd (U.S.A.F), the man many consider the greatest military strategist since Sun Tzu. Coram paints the picture of a larger-than-life man who had a "damn the torpedoes" attitude toward everything bureaucratic and wrong about the military. His inability to temper opinions in front of higher ranking officers and the military establishment in general undoubtedly severely limited his career. At the same time the breadth of his contribution toward military thinking and the defense of the United States is astounding.

John Boyd is arguably the best fighter pilot in American history. In the 1950s he earned the nickname "Forty Second Boyd" at Nellis air force base where as instructor he defeated all comers in simulated air to air combat in forty seconds or less. His abilities as a fighter pilot gave him unique insight into the full potential and glaring weaknesses of the fighter jets he flew.

Boyd made an unheard of transition, from fighter jock to scientist and engineer. During this transition Boyd published an article called the "Aerial Attack Study" that quantified air to air combat in terms never put on paper before - this represented a first step in changing fighter combat from a pure "gut feel" practice to a science that could be learned. He went on to totally revolutionize the field with the development of "Energy-Maneuverability Theory."

"The E-M Theory, at its simplest, is a method to determine the specific energy rate of an aircraft. This is what every fighter pilot wants to know. If I am at 30,000 feet and 450 knots and pull six Gs, how fast am I gaining or losing energy? Can my adversary gain or lose energy faster than I can? In an equation, specific energy rate is denoted by "Ps" (pronounced "p sub s"). The state of any aircraft in any flight regime can be defined with Boyd's simple equation: Ps = [(T-D)/W]V, or thrust minus drag over weight, multiplied by velocity. This is the core of E-M." p.147-148.

From this simple equation Boyd was able to determine the performance metrics of both U.S. aircraft in use and Soviet MIGs, and their relative strengths and weaknesses.

To a civilian, reading "Boyd" is an eye opener into the ways the United States military approaches defending our country. Movies like "Top Gun" might give the impression that skilled fighter pilots have been a celebrated and highly valued part of America's defense. Surprisingly, in the halls of the Pentagon nothing was further from the truth. The various military services, and the Air Force in particular followed a philosophy of interdiction that led to a "bigger, faster, farther" mindset when it came to aircraft and weapon system design.

Boyd, with the help of his "acolytes," six men who with Boyd became known as "the Reformers," was able to beat back the "bluesuiter" careerists at the Pentagon to radically influence multiple new plane programs. This included the F-15, the F-16, and the A10 "Warthog." The F-16, known as the "light fighter" was a plane that no one in the Pentagon wanted and one that Boyd effectively shoved down their throat (with good reason). Based on E-M theory a lighter fighter has far more ability to lose and then regain energy, making it a far more maneuverable, and deadly weapon. This was in direct opposition to the Air Force's theory of "push button, let missals do the rest" warfare.

And that, as they say, is where Boyd's career gets truly interesting. After making internal enemies throughout the Pentagon (mostly through his hard charging, disrespectful attitude toward incompetence and careerism, and of course direct opposition to status quo thinking) Boyd retired as a full Colonel in 1975. From there he spent the next 15 plus years working as a consultant to the military virtually for free (Pentagon rules forced him to get paid something, so he accepted one day of pay every two weeks). During this period of his life Boyd became a true scholar. As Coram describes it Boyd, interested in how he initially discovered E-M delved into works from all disciplines, eventually publishing a work entitled "Destruction and Creation."

Boyd continued to have massive, though unofficial influence at the Pentagon. Through mentoring and support of his "acolytes," and through a briefing entitled "Patterns of Conflict" that he delivered hundreds of times, Boyd began shaping the thinking on how the United States should fight wars. A favorite of few generals, Boyd's thinking found traction with those open to new ways of fighting, including back-channel relations with multiple high level people such as the Secretary of Defense.

Through the "Patterns" briefing, Boyd's developments, including the OODA Loop found their supporters. Ironically, it was the Marines, not the Air Force that primarily adopted Boyd's thinking. One of the Acolytes, Mike Wyly had fought in Vietnam and recognized the error of "straight up the middle" attrition warfare practiced by the U.S. Military. Wyly was in a position to influence Marine combat training using Boyd theories (though he experienced the same resistance that eventually ended his Marine Corps career).

Boyd's most impressive accomplishment is the performance of the Marine Corps in the Gulf war. U.S. strategy in that war, with the support of Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney and General Colin Powell was unquestionably influenced by Boyd and his work:

"What is still not generally known to the public is just how well the Marines performed in the Gulf.... Three days before war officially began, Myatt's (General Mike Myatt) men raided deep behind Iraqi lines. They bypassed strong points, forgot their flanks, and penetrated so deeply and caused such confusion that the Iraqi Army rushed in reinforcements against what they anticipated would be the main thrust of the American invasion. Then they began surrendering by the thousands. Nowhere can be found a better example of Boyd's ideas on "folding the enemy in on himself" than in the fact that some fifteen Iraqi divisions surrendered to two visions of Marines." p.424-425

Today, a wide school of thought in both military and business strategy is based on Boyd's work. Web sites such as www.belisarius.com and www.d-n-i.net showcase Boyd's ideas, as well as hundreds of articles and books. "Boyd," is a great read about someone who is clearly an American hero.

for more information click here

OUTSTANDING

This is an extraordinary book about a giant of a man. Boyd was from the old school, cigar, profanity and all---a giant larger-than-life intellect matched with a moral spine of steel. His maxim "to be, or to do" is instructive to the political and military leadership class in DC; many of the latter view with contempt.
Sadly, Boyd's family life suffered and is one area of his remarkable story where you wish you could jump in save an otherwise great man from the domestic turmoil.
This book will change the way you look at the Pentagon forever. It will change the way you view the world.
Get it, read it, you won't be disappointed.

for more information click here

Good book, unsubstantiated conclusions

A very readable biography of former Air Force fighter pilot and military theoretician, John R. Boyd. It traces the life of an eccentric, Air Force reformer who, if the author is to be believed, influenced the doctrine of the Air Force, Army, and Marines in the latter part of the 20th century, and even deserves credit for the overall concept for Desert Storm. He is best known for the OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act -- basically, get inside the enemy's decision cycle). He felt that Sun Tzu had a better understanding of the way war should be fought as opposed to Clausewitz, who Boyd felt was too worried about protecting one's own army, rather than taking Sun Tzu's approach and focusing on screwing up the other guy. Boyd created and drove an influential five to six hour briefing called "Patterns of Conflict."

Although the book is of little use from an academic standpoint, because of the author's controversial conclusions and lack of footnotes/documentation to back them up, it is interesting and easy read, and can still point to other basic sources that are directly cited in the text.

for more information click here

An insight to military thinking from battlefield tactics to acquistion strategy

When you read this book you are getting much, much more than the story of one man. This is an insider's guide to military air tactics, DoD bureaucracy, and weapons system acquisition. As a retired Naval Aviator, and Defense engineer working on weapons systems, I found this book to be extraordinarily enlightening. I plan to give several copies to friends of mine in the active-duty Navy and civilian defense industry. This book should be on every Soldier, Sailor, Airman, and Marine's bookshelf.

Story of a brilliant but troubled man.

Boyd was a genius who would be widely known as one of the most important thinkers of our time, were it not for his abrasive manner that made enemies in high places. How unfortunate that his remarkable contributions to military and broader world thinking has gotten so little recognition.

for more information click here