Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA | Richard C. Hoagland, Mike Bara

Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA | Richard C. Hoagland, Mike Bara | Interesting content, shame about the editing

books:

Dark Mission: The ...

	Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA Richard C. Hoagland, Mike Bara Feral House, 2007 - 550 pages average customer review:based on 101 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

Clever and Challenging

Forget the conspiracy theories aspects. Dig deeper in the context of the book. It is quite revealing. The author is known for his inquisitive mind and it shows in this current work. Frightening book but an essential. All the black projects and hidden scientific agenda are revealed. Powerful piece of work, no doubt. Add it to your library!!

Interesting content, shame about the editing

I've read almost everything there is on the subject of artificial structures on Mars and the Moon, from Hoagland, Rux, Sitchin, Hancock, Carlotto and Tonnie to even "Who Built the Moon?'' by Knight and Butler."Dark Mission'' takes that body of knowledge one step forward by speculating that NASA, essentially a government defense agency, could be responsible for hiding firm evidence about these artificial structures from the American public. Although I'm not as convinced by the photographic evidence given in the book, I'd have to admit that there MAY be things there that are artificial. For this, Hoagland and Bara are to be applauded. The science relating to hyperdimensional physics might be a bit difficult to follow (for greater depth I recommend "The Monkey and the Tetrahedron'' by David Jinks) but who's to say that it's wrong? To me, the most mind-blowing assertion has to be that JFK might have been assassinated because he had invited the Russians to participate with NASA in sending a man to the moon. And NASA's odd behaviour and delays in releasing Mars images is arguably telling. So yes, I'd say this book is a revealing and useful addition to the conspiracy, ET genre. My gripe however, is with the frequency with which the reader has to suffer punctuation and spelling errors, plus Hoagland's annoying habit of ITALICISING words or using "inverted commas" in every other sentence. The Boston University geologist who weather-dated the Sphinx is Robert Schoch and not Schock, the WW2 German missile testing facility is given as Mittelwerk first and then Mittelwork later then Mittelwerk again. "Words'' are suddenly "placed'' in inverted commas, SOMETIMES with only opening "commas but without closure. Italicising is so commonplace that it BECOMES tiresome. To be fair, I should have known - Hoagland's "Monuments of Mars'' is exactly the same and it irritated me no end when I read that book. You begin to wonder "why'' there is a NEED to keep PUNCTUATING sentences like "this'' and each time you come across an example, you have to re-read the sentence to make sure you get the intended meaning. Very tiresome indeed. So even though I think Hoagland and Bara have undoubtedly something intriguing to sell, I'd have to minus two stars for the annoyance factor.

for more information click here

Intrigued at first.

Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA

I viewed some Hoagland interviews on the internet. His performances intrigued me enough to purchase
the book.

I got to page 4 and read "Since the Face was not a profile view as seen in terrestrial rock faces like the
Old Man in the Mountain in New Jersey,". There once was an 'Old Man in the Mountain' in New Hampshire.
It collapsed on May 3, 2003. Now I question if said collapse had help.

I suspect this error is intentional and telltale of the book.

Still worth a read, but no answers. I would like to believe we went to the moon, but I am unconvinced.

for more information click here