God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything | Christopher Hitchens

God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything | Christopher Hitchens | god, revisited

books:

God Is Not Great: ...

	God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything Christopher Hitchens Twelve Books, Hachette Book Group, 2007 - 307 pages average customer review:based on 793 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

A Meticulous Study of Relgionists Falacies

For many years I was convinced I was an Agnostic---I just didn't know. After reading this book, I am convinced that I was a coward, afraid to question the religious pundits who use religion to control us. I am now proud to say I have been enlightened, and can truly call myself an Atheist.

god, revisited

Hitchens is the master at making atheists' 'beliefs' believable. Without the familiar histrionics of the intolerant and faith-based believers, he --if somewhat pedantically--sets forth hundreds of objective facts from the earliest religious history to the present hegemonies of the three great (an undeserved encomium; I would say, generously, 'giant') religions, without substantive challenge from the devout or argument-from-design faction. Believe in god or not (I now lower case him, after reading Hitchens), Hitchens gives you a qualified intellectual choice, not an inculcated conditioned response.

for more information click here

Talk Radio for Atheists

Unlike Dawkins' The God Delusion or Dennett's Breaking the Spell, Hitchens makes no effort to be conciliatory towards religionists. Even though, he has many good points, I doubt that many religionists could get past the strident tone. Hitchens pulls no punches in attacking the New and Old Testaments, the Koran, and eastern religions.

For atheists this book is a fun read, although I would still recommend Dawkins or Dennett for more careful arguments. I especially like the insights in Chapter 17: The Last-Ditch "Case" Against Secularism, where Hitchens confronts the Hitler/Stalin/etc. fallacy.

for more information click here

A very fun read

No matter what else you can say about this book, it was fun to read.

Hitches is an excellent writer, regularly quoting literature and poetry as well as scientific documentation and personal experience all blended into an extremely readable book which is scathing towards religion.

Some of the statements are so bold that I laughed out loud. He was insulting, but often to exactly the right people in exactly the way that they deserved.

That being said, as fun as it was, I don't find that Hitchens really attacks religion so much as specific people at specific places and times. We all know that religions in charge of countries and large populations don't often offer joy, harmony and happiness, but rather oppression, poverty and preach being happy with what you have while the leaders bask in luxury.

He did address much more modern points than many current writers, so the catholic church in many places even today continue to oppress poor people who they hold sway over.

This, of course, says nothing about God or the goodness or badness of religion in general and is unlikely to convince anyone but a fence sitter. Still, my hat is off to Hitchens for writing a damn good read.

for more information click here

My Favorite Contrarian Takes on the Lord

I would just like to say that one must read Hitchens for what he is: a contrarian. In terms of the subject matter itself, I might contest his thesis that "Religion poisons everything" by pointing out that religion is a rather broad topic that involves some fundamental and perhaps unavoidable aspects of human nature. If he had gone the distance and followed Kurt Vonnegut into the land of "homo sapiens poisons everything", I might have enjoyed this contrarian screed even more.

I think this book is served well by a comparison to Dawkins' "The God Delusion", as Hitchens seems to be more perceptive of human issues and less mechanistic in his thinking. The fact that Hitchens doesn't waste the reader's time with long-dead proofs of God's existence and lame attempts at evolutionary ethics makes it easy for Hitchens to look good in comparison.

With regard to Sam Harris, I don't think Hitchens compares so well. Harris is just as courageous as Hitchens, but he is admirably honest in his thinking. Harris is, in contrast, hesitant to sell himself as an atheist, as he believes that specific issues are more important than the big war over God. Hitchens is more like Nietzsche: a marvelously entertaining wrecking ball, though not quite as effectively murderous and less dogmatic.

for more information click here