The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 (Oxford History of the United States) |...

The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 (Oxford History of the United States) | Robert Middlekauff | Well done, but not the best.

books:

The Glorious Cause...

	The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 (Oxford History of the United States) Robert Middlekauff Oxford University Press, USA, 2007 - 752 pages average customer review:based on 42 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

highly recommended

Good but flawed

On balance this is a good, but a not great, book. I expected more from the first book in the Oxford History of the US series. This is not to say that the book is bad or not worth reading, it is just that it is, in my opinion, somewhat flawed, especially the first third of the book. After completing the early sections I was tempted to stop and go on to something else. Fortunately I did not, because, from my perspective, the book got better.

First the good points - This book covers the period from before the revolutionary war (starting in1763) - to the adoption of the Constitution in 1789. It is a well-written and scholarly work. It gives a reasonably good picture of the specific events leading up to the conflict and the positions of the Americans and the British. It discusses the history of the war and the reasons why it became international in scope. There were some very interesting sections concerning various aspects of the conflict that are often not covered in general treatments, such as: the medical crops, the wives left behind, financial and organizational difficulties, and many others. I learned a lot. For example, I got a much better appreciation for George Washington and his better generals and the handicaps that they labored under. I now understand that his genius (and those of his most successful subordinates) lay in making the most of the meager resources at their disposal and in never allowing the British the complete victory that would have won them the war. This book also corrected a misconception that I had concerning the numerical strength of the loyalists supporting the British crown. Contrary to the view stated in most books on the American Revolution Professor Middlekauff cites statistics showing that the loyalists only comprised about 1/5 of the non-slave population, not 1/3 as I had always believed and that they were almost everywhere a harassed minority. One reason for the failure of the British was that relatively few colonists flocked to their cause. There were loyalists and loyalist militia, but they were not as numerous as had been expected. The very interesting analysis of the difficulties that the British had in fighting a limited war against an enemy that could be defeated in battle, but never really subdued, has great resonance for current readers.

Before discussing what I feel are some of the flaws that prevent me from giving this book a five star recommendation, I would like to make a general comment. No single book, even one with almost 700 pages of text, can cover in detail the scope of the events leading up to the American Revolutionary war, the war itself, the development of a constitution and the ratification of that constitution. As such, the best that an author can hope for is that they provide a reasonable framework from which the reader can search for more detailed information. I believe that Professor Middlekauff has done this, although with the flaws that are described below.

Now the flaws:
1) In my opinion, this book does not sufficiently focus on the needs of the more casual reader who may require more background information. For instance, several chapters are devoted to the Stamp act, but there is no mention of what documents required stamps (or even that these stamps were to go on documents rather than on letters). Washington's service in the French and Indian war is mentioned in passing, but never really discussed. This was a pivotal event in Washington's life and the reason why he was appointed as the head of the Continental army. Surely this was worth more than just a brief passing reference. This is especially surprising since the book discusses the lives of English leaders, who were only briefly involved with the events leading up to the war. Likewise, insufficient background information is provided for all of the other important American political and military leaders. In my opinion, the book needs a brief overview of the founding of the various colonies, their various systems of government and the Americans involved in the war. There is little or no background concerning the British parliamentary system and British politics before and during the war. That there was British opposition to the war is hardly mentioned. There is a lack of a comprehensive review of the Articles of Confederation. They are referred to and there is a very brief mention of their development, but no systematic review of their most important features. Some deficiencies are discussed in the context of the need for their replacement by a new constitution. In contrast, there is a lengthy discussion of the development of the Virginia Constitution. It appears as if the author assumes that the reader is completely familiar with the Articles of Confederation, so no review of their most salient features is required. The book could have been greatly improved with short chapters rectifying all these and other omissions.
2) This is not primarily a military history book and those who want more about the fighting can find better choices. Pivotal battles, such as that at Bunker/Breed hill, Saratoga and Long Island/New York are discussed, but only in the most minimal way. Only one sentence is devoted to the important American victory at Bennington. The savage fighting at Oriskany NY is not even mentioned, nor is the massacre of American troops at Paoli PA. The author does a much better job of describing the fighting in the Carolinas, Georgia and finally at Yorktown.
3) The book contains 20 maps, but they are murky at best. The land mass is shown in gray with black lettering for the town and rivers and with black arrows denoting troop movements. In contrast, the water (which generally contained almost no further detail) is shown nicely in white. Single maps are used for a whole campaign or battle, instead of multiple maps denoting different stages of that aspect of the war. The result of these deficiencies is to reduce the usefulness of the few maps that are provided.

The addition of perhaps 20 additional maps and about 30 pages of additional text aimed at the more casual reader, could have gone far to correct these flaws. Given that book is 736 pages long (including the index and bibliographical notes), an additional 50 pages would not have seriously increased the size or cost of the book. If necessary, some judicious editing could eliminate some extraneous details, enabling the addition of these 50 pages without increasing the final size of the book. It is hoped that these flaws will be corrected in a subsequent revision. Then, in my opinion, it would be the 5 star book that I had expected it to be.

for more information click here

Well done, but not the best.

Thorough. Fine one-book overview of theories and events of the American Revolution. There are much better books that focus on specific events and theories, but this covers most of the basics well. It's supposedly a re-release of an older book, but there isn't too much new scholarship included in it. Perhaps a shame as there have been some great books published over the past 10+ years on the Revolution.

Ideals Lead the Revolution

This is a thorough study of the American Revolution. It would not be appropriate to say that it was a page turner but it covered the field very well. It took my many months to finish it and I will keep it nearby as I begin to read more about the revolution. (One of the best parts of retirement is the luxury or reading about a period of history over a relatively short period of time and when one is not tired)

There are a few points that are made that made me stop to think. First, the emphasis that Mr Middlekauff places on ideals. There are many explanations of the causes of the revolution he emphasis is on the lack of freedom the colonies felt. Mostly it seems that the feeling that the colonists were not given full rights of Englishmen was the catalyst for the revolution. Also it shows that liberty comes from inside the country. Democracy has to be home grown to be effective.

Second, I enjoyed the discussion of what we would call today guerrilla warfare. The colonists were able to win by changing the method of combat. I could not help but thinking about Iraq when I read this section.

I recommend to read the Great Upheaval in putting the revolution in context.

for more information click here

Very Detailed... Too Detailed

The good and bad of this book can really be summed up that easily in my opinion. The book is very detailed in its history, however, the amount of detail the book provides also gets in the way of the story. The first 5 or so chapters talks about tax collectors and stories of individuals. While it is interestng, for me, the amount and detail of individual stories takes away from the story of the revolution and all the events which lead up to it.

reviews: 1, page 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

products you might be interested in